I still remember the first time I had to choose between a strain gauge and a torque sensor. It was a cramped motor lab. Old bench. Coffee gone cold. The project manager wanted answers by Friday. On paper the choice looked simple. In the real world it never is. Every project has its own personality. Speed. Budget. Accuracy. Abuse level. And usually a deadline that doesn’t care about any of that.
If you have spent time around test stands and factory motors you know this dilemma well. Torque measurement sounds straightforward until you actually have to do it. That is when questions start piling up. How accurate do we really need to be. Will this thing survive vibration. Can we install it without tearing the whole setup apart. And the big one. Will it still read the same after six months of heat cycles and late night overtime runs.
I have wired up foil strain gauges at two in the morning trying to hit a calibration window. I have also slid inline torque sensors into couplings and watched clean stable data appear like magic. Both tools earn their keep. Both can burn you if you choose wrong. Let’s talk through it like engineers do over coffee. No marketing gloss. Just what actually happens on the bench and on the factory floor.
Strain gauges are usually where torque measurement journeys begin. They are simple in concept. A thin foil grid bonded to metal. Apply torque. The metal strains. Resistance changes. You read millivolts and convert that into torque. Elegant. Affordable. When everything goes right, they can be surprisingly accurate.
In static or slow-moving applications, a well-installed foil strain gauge in a Wheatstone bridge can hit around 0.1 to 0.25 percent of full scale. I have seen even better numbers in controlled lab conditions. Reaction torque setups are where they shine. Motor calibration rigs. Bolt preload measurement. Static gearbox testing. You lock the housing. Measure reaction force. Convert to torque. Clean and direct.
But the reality shows up once the motor starts humming. Strain gauges are sensitive souls. Temperature changes creep in slowly and bend your zero. Humidity sneaks under the adhesive if you are not careful. Vibration works on that bond like a chisel. I once had a gauge peel off mid test. Perfect run. Data looks great. Then the signal drifted off like a bad dream. Postmortem showed the adhesive had softened just enough to let go.
Wiring is another quiet enemy. Those tiny leads do not like movement. Route them wrong and vibration will fatigue them. Route them right and someone will still snag them during maintenance. Signal conditioning is mandatory. You are dealing with 2 mV per volt signals. Noise becomes your constant companion. Ground loops. EMI from drives. Suddenly your torque trace looks like a seismograph.
Dynamic torque measurement with strain gauges is possible but it takes work. High speed shafts amplify every weakness. The bridge needs careful balancing. Temperature compensation becomes critical. Bandwidth is usually limited to around 1 kHz in practical setups. That is fine for many tests. It is not fine when you want to see fast transients or control torque in real time.
Cost is why strain gauges stay popular. Fifty to two hundred dollars for the gauges themselves. Add adhesive. Protective coatings. Signal conditioners. Labor. Suddenly the cheap option is not quite as cheap. Still for one off tests and static measurements they are hard to beat.
Torque sensors feel like cheating the first time you use one. Especially if you have spent years wrestling with strain gauges. You bolt them in. Connect power and signal. And the data just works. That is not an accident. Torque sensors are strain gauges done right and packaged for survival.
Most torque sensors still use bonded strain gauges internally. The difference is everything around them. Precision machined shafts. Optimized gauge placement. Factory calibration. Sealed housings. Temperature compensation baked in. Some designs go further with optical or magnetostrictive sensing for contactless measurement. The goal is the same. Stable accurate torque under real operating conditions.
Accuracy is where torque sensors start pulling ahead. Typical numbers range from 0.02 to 0.1 percent of full scale. Linearity is excellent. Hysteresis is low. Repeatability is boringly good. You get a 10 V output or a digital stream that plays nicely with modern controllers and DAQ systems.
Speed is the other big win. Dynamic response up to 10 kHz is common. That matters when shafts spin fast and loads change faster. Robotics. BLDC motors under field oriented control. Test stands doing rapid torque sweeps. You can actually see what the motor is doing instead of guessing from the current.
Durability is often overlooked until something breaks. Torque sensors are built for overload. Two hundred to five hundred percent overload capacity is typical. Some go to one thousand percent. That one time an operator jams a gearbox will not instantly end your measurement. Environmental sealing matters too. IP67 rated sensors laugh at oil mist and coolant spray that would destroy an exposed strain gauge.
There is a cost for all this goodness. Torque sensors are not cheap. A decent inline unit can run from several hundred to several thousand dollars. Reaction torque sensors are usually less but still more than bare gauges. What you buy with that money is time. Installation time. Debug time. Maintenance time. And confidence.
This is where torque sensors vs strain gauges becomes a real engineering conversation instead of a catalog comparison. On paper, both measure torque. In practice, they live very different lives.
Strain gauges give you flexibility. You can put them almost anywhere. Custom geometries. One-off shafts. Large structures. That freedom comes with responsibility. Every installation is a small science project. Adhesive choice. Surface prep. Bridge configuration. Shielding. Calibration. Each decision affects accuracy.
Torque sensors trade flexibility for consistency. You adapt your setup to the sensor instead of the other way around. In return, you get known performance. Published accuracy. Known bandwidth. Stable zero. If you need repeatable data across multiple test stands, this matters more than you think.
Dynamic accuracy is a key difference. Engineers often ask how accurate strain gauges are for dynamic torque. The honest answer is it depends. At low frequencies, they can be excellent. As frequency increases, errors creep in. Adhesive damping. Wiring resonance. Signal conditioning limits. Torque sensors are designed with dynamic behavior in mind. They hold accuracy when things get fast.
Resolution also plays a role. A strain gauge bridge at 2 mV per volt pushes your DAQ hard. Any noise eats resolution. Torque sensors with 10 V outputs or digital encoders give you more usable bits. This matters when you chase small torque changes on large shafts.
Overload behavior is another quiet differentiator. Strain gauges live on the edge. Exceed the elastic limit and calibration is gone. Torque sensors are designed to survive abuse. I have seen them shrug off events that would have ripped gauges clean off a shaft.
Here is a simple snapshot that engineers often ask for when making the call.
| Table 1 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Strain Gauge Setup | Torque Sensor |
| Typical Accuracy | 0.1 to 0.5% FS | 0.02 to 0.1% FS |
| Bandwidth | Up to 1 kHz | Up to 10 kHz |
| Hysteresis | Moderate | Very Low |
| Overload Capacity | Limited | 200 to 1000% |
| Temperature Stability | Sensitive | Compensated |
| Typical Cost | $50 to $200 plus labor | $500 to $5000 |
Numbers help. Experience decides.
Installation is where theory meets reality. This is also where many projects quietly fail. Strain gauges demand patience. Surface prep alone can make or break the measurement. Clean metal. Proper roughness. Correct adhesive cure. Skip a step and you pay later.
I once watched a junior tech rush a strain gauge install to meet a test slot. Looked fine. Passed initial calibration. Two hours into a thermal run the zero drifted so far we had to scrap the data. The adhesive had not fully cured. Lesson learned the hard way.
Routing wires matters more than people think. Strain gauge leads to hate vibration. They hate sharp edges. They hate EMI. You end up spending hours tying them down and shielding them. Then someone opens the enclosure and moves them just enough to change the noise floor.
Torque sensors flip this experience. Installation is mechanical. Align shafts. Set couplings. Torque bolts. Electrical hookup is usually a single connector. The signal is strong. Noise is minimal. Commissioning time drops dramatically. In production environments this difference is huge.
Reaction torque sensors simplify things further. Bolt them down. Attach the motor housing or gearbox. Done. No adhesive. No fragile wiring. For motor testing and calibration this can save days over the life of a program.
Maintenance is the long tail. Strain gauges need periodic checks. Recoating. Recalibration. Torque sensors tend to just keep working. When budgets are tight maintenance is often invisible until it hurts. Choosing a robust sensor can quietly save projects years later.
Motor testing is where torque measurement earns its paycheck. Especially with modern BLDC motors and field oriented control. Torque is no longer just a result. It is part of the control loop.
Strain gauges still have a place here. Dyno calibration rigs often use reaction torque measurement with gauges for reference. Static torque mapping. Efficiency testing. End of line checks where speed is low. If you understand their limits they work well.
But once you move into dynamic control torque sensors start winning arguments. Inline torque sensors give you real time feedback at the shaft. High bandwidth lets controllers respond quickly. In robotics this enables force limiting and compliant motion. In AGVs it improves safety and efficiency.
I have seen BLDC motor test stands struggle with current based torque estimation. Add an inline torque sensor and suddenly the control loop tightens up. You see cogging. You see saturation. You see mechanical issues that current alone hides.
Production monitoring is another area where torque sensors shine. Continuous measurement. Harsh environments. Minimal maintenance. Strain gauges simply cannot survive on a factory floor long term without constant care.
Cost per accuracy point is a question managers love to ask. On paper strain gauges look unbeatable. Low component cost. Flexible use. But the real cost includes time. Labor. Risk.
A strain gauge install might take hours. Calibration takes more. Debugging takes even more. If you only need a few tests this is fine. If you need repeatability across shifts and operators the hidden cost grows.
Torque sensors cost more upfront. They save time every single day. Installation time comparison is not even close. Minutes versus hours. When projects scale this difference dominates.
Accuracy per dollar also changes when you include dynamic performance. Getting 0.1 percent dynamic accuracy from strain gauges is possible but expensive in effort. Torque sensors deliver it out of the box.
I like to think in terms of the cost of bad data. One scrapped test run. One missed issue. One late redesign. Suddenly the expensive sensor looks cheap.
After all these years the decision still comes down to a few core questions. How fast does the torque change. How accurate does it need to be in the real world. How harsh is the environment. How much time do you have to babysit the measurement.
If the project is static. Low speed. Budget constrained. And you have skilled hands. Strain gauges make sense. They teach you a lot. They reward careful work. They punish shortcuts.
If the project is dynamic. High speed. Production oriented. Or part of a control loop. Torque sensors almost always win. Especially when reliability matters more than initial cost.
Torque sensors vs strain gauges is not about right or wrong. It is about fit. The best engineers I know choose the tool that lets them sleep at night. After enough midnight test runs you learn that peace of mind has real value.
The next time you face that choice. Standing in the lab. Coffee cooling. Deadline looming. Think about where the data will live. Think about who will maintain it. And remember that time a strain gauge peeled off mid test. That memory alone has sold more torque sensors than any brochure ever will.
JLCPCB – Prototype 10 PCBs for $2 (For Any Color)
China’s Largest PCB Prototype Enterprise, 600,000+ Customers & 10,000+ Online Orders Daily
How to Get PCB Cash Coupon from JLCPCB: https://bit.ly/2GMCH9w