USB DISCUSSION

Routing USB 2.0 D+ and D- on a two-layer PCB: how much does 90 ohm impedance matter?

Started by jasvantsinghyadav USB differential pair routing90 ohm impedancefull-speed USB layoutlength matchingtwo-layer PCB
4 replies 248 views 5 participants
Latest activity · 30 Sep 2026

Routing USB 2.0 D+ and D- on a two-layer PCB: how much does 90 ohm impedance matter?

jasvantsinghyadav USB Forum
#1

I am routing a full-speed USB connection from a USB-C connector to a microcontroller about 25 mm away on a two-layer, 1.6 mm board. Guides insist on a 90 Ω differential pair with length matching, but the calculator gives trace widths on this stackup that are wider than the pin pitch of my parts.

Does controlled impedance really matter over such a short distance at full speed, and what are the layout rules that do matter?

Community replies 4

Re: Routing USB 2.0 D+ and D- on a two-layer PCB: how much does 90 ohm impedance matter?

#2

Impedance control matters when the trace is long compared with the signal's edge. Full-speed USB (12 Mbit/s) has rise and fall times specified between 4 and 20 ns. Signals travel along FR-4 traces at roughly 150 mm per ns, so even the fastest 4 ns edge is about 600 mm long. A common rule treats a trace as a transmission line only when it is longer than about one sixth of that, 100 mm here. Your 25 mm connection is electrically short: reflections settle within the edge, and the exact impedance has little effect.

High-speed USB (480 Mbit/s) is a different matter. Its edges are around 500 ps, the same rule gives roughly 12 mm, and there the 90 Ω requirement must be taken seriously.

Re: Routing USB 2.0 D+ and D- on a two-layer PCB: how much does 90 ohm impedance matter?

#3

The calculator is right about two-layer boards. Differential impedance depends on trace width, spacing and the distance to the reference plane. With 1.6 mm between the traces and the ground on the other side, a 90 Ω pair needs very wide traces or a very tight gap, which is why the result looks absurd. On a four-layer board the plane is only about 0.1 to 0.2 mm below the surface and the same impedance comes out at comfortable widths.

For a short full-speed link on two layers, route the pair with ordinary trace widths, side by side with a constant gap, and accept that the impedance is higher than nominal. For high-speed USB, move to four layers or use a coplanar structure with ground beside the traces, and take the dimensions from your manufacturer's impedance calculator for their actual stackup.

Re: Routing USB 2.0 D+ and D- on a two-layer PCB: how much does 90 ohm impedance matter?

#4

The rules that matter at any speed: keep D+ and D- together as a pair from connector to chip, over unbroken ground copper on the other layer for the whole route. Do not let the pair cross a gap or slot in the ground, because the return current then has to detour and the loop radiates and picks up noise. Avoid vias in the pair if you can; if you need them, move both traces through vias at the same point and add a ground via next to them. Avoid stubs, such as a test point hanging on a side branch.

Keep the pair away from switching regulators, crystals and clock lines, and place the ESD protection device right at the connector so a discharge is diverted before it travels along the board.

Re: Routing USB 2.0 D+ and D- on a two-layer PCB: how much does 90 ohm impedance matter?

#5

Length matching is often overdone. Delay on FR-4 is about 6 to 7 ps per millimetre, so a 5 mm mismatch between D+ and D- is roughly 33 ps of skew. A full-speed bit lasts 83.3 ns, so that skew is 0.04 % of a bit and completely irrelevant. Even at high speed the bit is 2.08 ns and 33 ps is under 2 %; PHY layout guides typically ask for matching within a millimetre or two, which is easy to meet on a short route without serpentine tuning. Do not add meanders to a full-speed pair; they only make the route longer.

With USB-C there is one unavoidable asymmetry: the connector has two D+ and two D- pins that must be joined, which creates a small stub or crossing. Keep those joining traces as short as possible, directly at the connector pads.

TEP COMMUNITY